Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security

On 10/26/24 6:01 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

On 26/10/2024 08:01, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:

On 10/26/24 1:51 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

On 26 Oct 2024 05:45:31 GMT, rbowman wrote:
>

About the time Heidegger asked 'Why are there beings at all rather than
nothing?' in 'Introduction to Metaphysics' my head started to hurt. That
was sentence 1, chapter 1. It didn't get better from there on.

>
Did he mention the Anthropic Principle at all?
>
That’s a controversial one. Fred Hoyle used it to predict the existence of
an energetic state of the carbon atom without which heavier elements could
not be synthesized.

>
>
   All philosophy is bullshit - including this philosophy  :-)
>
>

That is the reaction of 99% of those who are exposed to it.
 But it isn't.  It has tools enabling you to think in extremely different ways.

   That's what LSD is for  :-)
   Sorry, bullshit. That's the most useful take.

The problem is most people think it purports to reveal Truth, but it doesn't. It is however and interesting study of Lies.

   Lies/mistakes and long LONG "justifications" of said lies/mistakes.
   Waste of bandwidth.