Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security
De : candycanearter07 (at) *nospam* candycanearter07.nomail.afraid (candycanearter07)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 28. Oct 2024, 14:40:05
Autres entêtes
Organisation : the-candyden-of-code
Message-ID : <slrnvhv4cm.3c5.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote at 09:39 this Monday (GMT):
On 28/10/2024 03:20, candycanearter07 wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote at 23:43 this Friday (GMT):
On Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:39:58 -0700, John Ames wrote:
>
In fact, you can never be truly certain of anything at all!
>
Can you be certain of that?
 
 
Certainly maybe.
The one irrefutable fact is that there are, with this exception, no
irrefutable facts. But this is of course a meta-fact in a different
dimension


"There are no absolutes" is also a paradox
--
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Oct 24 * Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security115Lester Thorpe
22 Oct 24 +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1John McCue
23 Oct 24 +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security110186282@ud0s4.net
23 Oct 24 i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security105Richard Kettlewell
24 Oct 24 ii+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security101Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 iii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security100Richard Kettlewell
24 Oct 24 iii `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security99Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 iii  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security96candycanearter07
25 Oct 24 iii  i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
25 Oct 24 iii  i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security94Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 iii  i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security93John Ames
26 Oct 24 iii  i  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security20Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security19candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security8The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Chris Ahlstrom
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i iii`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security9rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2rbowman
4 Nov 24 iii  i  i   i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Physfitfreak
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i    +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Pancho
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i    `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security72The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 iii  i   `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security71Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i    +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2vallor
26 Oct 24 iii  i    i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Chris Ahlstrom
26 Oct 24 iii  i    `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security68rbowman
26 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security4The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2D
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5vallor
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2rbowman
26 Oct 24 iii  i     ii`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Chris Ahlstrom
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .27Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .26186282@ud0s4.net
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1D
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .24The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).7The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i+* Re: We're in the middle, always.3The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii+- Re: Who you are, where you are, when you are.1The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii`- Re: We're in the middle, always.1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i+* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).2rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii`- Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i`- Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .16D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .10186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i+- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .8D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .7186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .4D
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i   `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i    `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i     `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1rbowman
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .5The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i    `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .4D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i     `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i      +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i      `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security4D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .13The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i+* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .11rbowman
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .10186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .2186282@ud0s4.net
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii i `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .6DFS
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .5Joel
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3DFS
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   i+- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Joel
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   i`- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security7Physfitfreak
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1DFS
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Joel
28 Oct 24 iii  i      `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Richard Kettlewell
25 Oct 24 ii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3186282@ud0s4.net
23 Oct 24 i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Phillip Frabott
24 Oct 24 i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lester Thorpe
25 Oct 24 +- Migrant1Steve Hayes
29 Jan 25 +- Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1J.O. Aho
9 Feb 25 `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1MarioCCCP

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal