Sujet : Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.os.linux.miscDate : 28. Oct 2024, 17:32:02
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <02fvhjhffvqr06foaldocqi7be4eadoqno@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
CrudeSausage <
crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2024-10-27 9:46 p.m., Physfitfreak wrote:
I was once a neighbor to a philosophy major
in same school. Her thesis was based on the same theme. She was telling
me I was only one among the three in her life that listened and
understood what she was talking about.
I fucked her of course. She was a cro-magnon of Czech background. One of
those feminists I fucked hard!
>
It's unfortunate that a person of Slavic background would allow a
Neanderthal who speaks Arabic inside her. I assume she was disgustingly
ugly like the other White women who have decided to have relations with you.
Shut the fuck up, cracker, Jesus fucking Christ. Bigot.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.