Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy comp.os.linux.misc
Date : 28. Oct 2024, 22:20:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vfov6o$1635o$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 09:39:12 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

The one irrefutable fact is that there are, with this exception, no
irrefutable facts.

So there is supposedly only one exception? But that is also, by your
argument, an irrefutable fact, is it not?

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Oct 24 * Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security115Lester Thorpe
22 Oct 24 +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1John McCue
23 Oct 24 +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security110186282@ud0s4.net
23 Oct 24 i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security105Richard Kettlewell
24 Oct 24 ii+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security101Lawrence D'Oliveiro
24 Oct 24 iii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security100Richard Kettlewell
24 Oct 24 iii `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security99Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 iii  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security96candycanearter07
25 Oct 24 iii  i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
25 Oct 24 iii  i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security94Lawrence D'Oliveiro
25 Oct 24 iii  i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security93John Ames
26 Oct 24 iii  i  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security20Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security19candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security8The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Chris Ahlstrom
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i iii`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1candycanearter07
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i ii `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
28 Oct 24 iii  i  i +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security9rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security8Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2rbowman
4 Nov 24 iii  i  i   i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Physfitfreak
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i   `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i    +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Pancho
29 Oct 24 iii  i  i    `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security72The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 iii  i   `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security71Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i    +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2vallor
26 Oct 24 iii  i    i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Chris Ahlstrom
26 Oct 24 iii  i    `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security68rbowman
26 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security4The Natural Philosopher
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2D
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1186282@ud0s4.net
26 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security5vallor
26 Oct 24 iii  i     i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2rbowman
26 Oct 24 iii  i     ii`- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Chris Ahlstrom
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .27Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .26186282@ud0s4.net
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1D
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .24The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).7The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i+* Re: We're in the middle, always.3The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii+- Re: Who you are, where you are, when you are.1The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii`- Re: We're in the middle, always.1rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i+* Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).2rbowman
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  ii`- Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  i`- Re: The "big bang" was fueled by "residual eXergy" (potential entropy).1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .16D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .10186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i+- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .8D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .7186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .4D
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i   `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3rbowman
29 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i    `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
30 Oct 24 iii  i     i   i     `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1rbowman
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i   `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .5The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i    `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .4D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i     `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i      +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i      `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security6The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i+- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security4D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1D
28 Oct 24 iii  i     i  `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .13The Natural Philosopher
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i+* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .11rbowman
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .10186282@ud0s4.net
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3The Natural Philosopher
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii i`* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .2186282@ud0s4.net
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii i `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .6DFS
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii  `* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .5Joel
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   +* Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .3DFS
28 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   i+- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Joel
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   i`- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
29 Oct 24 iii  i     ii   `- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     i`- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
27 Oct 24 iii  i     +- Re: As the cosmos goes from infinitely hot/dense to infinitely cold/sparse . . .1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i     `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security7Physfitfreak
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1DFS
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1The Natural Philosopher
28 Oct 24 iii  i      +- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1Joel
28 Oct 24 iii  i      `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
26 Oct 24 iii  `* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Richard Kettlewell
25 Oct 24 ii`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security3186282@ud0s4.net
23 Oct 24 i+* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Phillip Frabott
24 Oct 24 i`* Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security2Lester Thorpe
25 Oct 24 +- Migrant1Steve Hayes
29 Jan 25 +- Re: {OT illegal-alien} ...was Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1J.O. Aho
9 Feb 25 `- Re: Torvalds Slams Theoretical Security1MarioCCCP

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal