Re: Report: Arm cancelling contract with Qualcomm

rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 22:03:34 -0400, Joel wrote:

chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:

rbowman wrote:
>

Blacks seem to be over represented in ads or shows.

>
Obviously *way* over represented.  It's sickening to have them rubbed
into our faces all the time.

 
Uh, there's a reason they wouldn't hire *you*, goofy nerdy white boy,
for these positions, you'd SUCK.  Get over it, blacks are more often
cool, deal with it, you've chosen to be a dickless nerd, posting
"snipped, unread" to Usenet 20 times a day.  You suck.

>
Kind of racist there, aren't you boy? Why does the color of someone's skin
make them cool?

I didn't make such an assertion.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.