Re: obs-studio, vlc

Le 28-10-2024, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> a écrit :

some inferior being wrote:

chrisv wrote:

>
There's not one thing wrong with talking about, or insulting, some
dumb fsck in your kill file.

>
It's not an explanation, it's a confirmation of your pretended
"deleted not read" messages.

>
It's no such thing, obviously.

Thanks for your confirmation you explained nothing.

Confirmation that you are a liar.

If you killfile someone, you don't see his messages. It's not my way of
seing things, it's the definition of the killfile. So you can't answer
them. So if you answer a message from someone you killfile, it proves
you don't killfile him.

It's a loss of time and it proves
that the guy you pretend to killfile is way more important to you
than what you claim.

>
Just the opposite, dumbshit.

You mean it takes you more time to killfile someone than to read and
answer his messages?

It is my victory when they read me and I don't read them.

That's a funny one. What do you win exactly? The ultimate winner,
considering your only point of view, would be someone reading nobody and
sending a lot of messages. It would be pointless and you would be the
only one in the world to consider him a winner.

The purpose of sending messages here, is not only to be read, but to
exchange. If you don't want exchanges, you create your blog with a one
side communication. If you killfile someone, it's not a victory, it
proves you can't exchange with someone. So, it's when reading and
answering him would be a loss of time, you win time killfiling him.

When you take some time to answer someone you pretend to killfile, you
prove him his message is important for you. And when you insult someone
you killfile, you prove he's important to you because it means you think
about him when you don't need to. So showing everyone you are pissed of
with someone proves he infuriates you when he doesn't care about you. So
it's nothing like a victory.

I'm demonstrating my superiority, especially when I commit in advance
to letting some inferior being have the last word, unread and
unrebutted. 

In fact, as you answer the message, you don't let him have the last
word. It's exactly the opposite: you want to have the last word at all
costs even when you have no more argument and are unable to rebute him.
So you demonstrate the exact opposite of what you pretend and you let
someone you consider an inferior being win over you. You shouldn't be
proud of loosing against an inferior being.

Nore:  Your response will be deleted, unread.

Each time you said that, you answered it in a way that proves you read
it.

Note: It's not boastful to be superior to some POS who attacks with
lies.

You are superior to no one. You have never been able to give a logical
answer. Only stupid sentences. You can't argue, you can only rely on
mere insults to hide it.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io