Sujet : Re: Why No GNU/Linux Women ?
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 02. Nov 2024, 12:17:30
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <ne2cijdtr73gch6osrljc5ktld30mo2vem@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
candycanearter07 <
candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
wrote:
Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote at 19:49 this Friday (GMT):
Le 28-10-2024, candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> a écrit :
>
I mean, I'm not super good at coding but thanks
>
I don't know your coding level, but you can't be inferior to
DG/LP/FR/whatever. The only coding he can do is copy paste some code he
found on Internet.
>
I've done a little bit of coding for a OSS game and have a few C
projects on my github.
Stéphane is correct, you are destined to be a really good programmer/
developer, Larry/Russell/nymshifting punk bitch is an aging never-was.
You just keep doing you, you're the future of great computing, thank
you for being here, and fuck Larry.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.