Re: So How’s Dimdows-on-ARM Doing?

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

That *will* change.

>
That’s what I mean by “spouting hot air”.

 
You mean like an IntelAMD's fan?  Heh.

>
Look, we are agreed that x86 is a dead end. You seem to think that Windows
will somehow make the successful transition to some non-x86 architecture.
I am merely pointing out that it never has, and never will.

I only care to the extent that Winblows sells hardware, I would delete
Win11Copilot, if I bought one with it preinstalled, but there will be
self-assembled ARM desktops before long, and Linux will be all the
more immediately viable on them.  But M$ is going to support it more
and more, too, there's no reason it can't.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.