Sujet : Re: Distros Say: "Wayland." Distro Lackeys Say: "Yassah Massah."
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 11. Nov 2024, 10:46:32
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <2hk3jj5g5q3nvrfv97dn4ih44af1njh3he@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Farley Flud <
ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:30:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>
While I wouldn't say Wayland is "garbage", I don't really like how it
would break a lot of my apps. For now, I'll be sticking with Wayland
until X11 backwards compatibility is implemented.
>
Do you believe that those clowns at freedesktop.org give a damn
about backward compatibility?
>
Talk to them about backward compatibility and they'll laugh in
your face and accuse you of being anti-progressive and stuck
in the past.
>
They will easily toss 50 years of software development onto
the trash heap and their mainstream distro flunkies will
accept it all without protest.
You ever think of simply choosing a distro that uses X? Your
arguments are always designed to defend having a joke of a setup, your
system would suck balls with any graphical scheme.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.