Re: Distros Say: "Wayland." Distro Lackeys Say: "Yassah Massah."

Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:

Le 11-11-2024, Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :

Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:

On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 01:30:03 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 wrote:
>

While I wouldn't say Wayland is "garbage", I don't really like how it
would break a lot of my apps. For now, I'll be sticking with Wayland
until X11 backwards compatibility is implemented.

>
Do you believe that those clowns at freedesktop.org give a damn
about backward compatibility?
>
Talk to them about backward compatibility and they'll laugh in
your face and accuse you of being anti-progressive and stuck
in the past.
>
They will easily toss 50 years of software development onto
the trash heap and their mainstream distro flunkies will
accept it all without protest.

>
You ever think

>
No, he can't. That's obvious in any of his messages.
>

of simply choosing a distro that uses X?

>
You mean installing something not installed by default by his distro?
No, he's a distro lackey.

AFAICT, my Debian uses X by default.  I see nothing about Wayland.
Larry apparently thinks all distros are alike, which he's partially
right about, they're all superior to his ridiculous, lacking a modern
browser, no DE, retardo setup.

Your
arguments are always designed to defend having a joke of a setup, your
system would suck balls with any graphical scheme.

>
There is nothing wrong with his system. The issue is with his way of
using it. He claims he's the best user when he's so slow that he
shouldn't brag about it. And the fact that he's relying heavily on a GUI
when he says that GUI are stupid is an issue too.
>
But its look is only a matter of taste. If it looks ugly to you,  he is
the one to use it, so he has no reason to adapt it to your tastes. To
speak about something you'll understand, his way of choosing a theme for
his GUI is as valid as your way of choosing a partner with a dick. If
you claim about your right to have different tastes, you can't criticise
his tastes.

I am not sure I'd compare his silly computer to sexual preferences ...

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.