Re: SJW and subversive professor: "LINUX IS IMPORTANT FOR YOUR CAREER"

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:

"You are very strongly urged to install Linux on your home PC, if you
don’t already have it there."
>
>
It's from the syllabus of an old computer science course.
>
https://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/matloff/public_html/50/Syllabus.pdf
>
>
>
"Work on Minority Issues:
>
Professor Matloff lived in an ethnically-mixed East Los Angeles
neighborhood during his early childhood, helping to shape his lifelong
support for affirmative action and activism in improving conditions for
people of color in general and the impoverished, as well as improving
the status of women. Starting with his work in high school in the
election campaign of a black woman (Myrlie Evers), his quest for social
justice has been a major driving force in his life.
>
He writes frequently about these issues, such as his support of
affirmative action, his exposure of age discrimination and abuse of
foreign worker visa programs in the tech industry, and his defense of
immigrant Asian-American scientists who have been discriminated against
in our national laboratories (Los Alamos and NASA). Prof. Matloff has
been a recipient of the UC Davis Distinguished Public Service Award, in
recognition of his work in these and other areas.
>
Dr. Matloff brings these ideas into his teaching as well. His department
has its own ethics course, ECS 188, which he has taught several times.
His reading list and assigned term paper reflect this."
>
>
If I poke around I'm sure I can find some anti-MS\Windows whining from
this academic.

Oh how awful, if only he had the common sense to troll COLA for 20
years, with nonsensical praise of Winblows!!!

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.