Sujet : Re: So How’s Dimdows-on-ARM Doing?
De : ldo (at) *nospam* nz.invalid (Lawrence D'Oliveiro)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 11. Nov 2024, 21:59:40
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vgtr7r$15srv$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 11:17:52 -0500, DFS wrote:
On 11/10/2024 6:17 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
Look, we are agreed that x86 is a dead end.
... agreeing with each other about something irrational?
Even Microsoft agrees x86 is a dead end. Otherwise, why is it putting so
much (futile) effort into Windows-on-ARM?
Actually Windows-on-Qualcomm-ARM, which is why it’s futile.
So How’s Dimdows-on-ARM Doing?
Re: So How’s Dimdows-on-ARM Doing?