Re: So How’s Dimdows-on-ARM Doing?

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

I only care to the extent that Winblows sells hardware ...

>
That hardware comes from the PC vendors, and their enthusiasm for Windows-
on-ARM is not exactly effusive as of late.
>

But M$ is going to support it more and more, too, there's no reason it
can't.

>
It’s not up to Microsoft. People don’t buy Windows machines for the sake
of Windows; they buy it for the apps they need to run on it. That app
support for running natively on ARM hasn’t exactly set the world on fire,
as I pointed out in the posting that started this thread.

"As I pointed out", it's still early.  You're expecting some instant
result, but it's been literally a month or two, a few years from now,
Win and Lin on ARM will be a major force.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.