Sujet : Re: Distros Say: "Wayland." Distro Lackeys Say: "Yassah Massah."
De : sc (at) *nospam* fiat-linux.fr (Stéphane CARPENTIER)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 24. Nov 2024, 00:36:10
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Mulots' Killer
Message-ID : <674266ea$0$5211$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Le 23-11-2024, chrisv <
chrisv@nospam.invalid> a écrit :
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
Thanks for the good laugh. It's exactly my point:
- You pretend to ignore him, but you answer his message.
- You pretend to let him having the last word, but you answer his
message.
You just failed in everything you claimed. Good job.
>
So, now, I'm ready to laugh even more: explain why you didn't failed and
why it proves your superiority. I'm going to fetch some popcorn: it's
going to be funny.
>
*sigh*
Yes, you should.
He does get the last word, if no one responds
Yes, it's the definition. So when you answer, you don't let him having
the last word. We both agree. So you failed letting him the last word.
and quotes it so that I can see it.
That's not in the definition of the last word. You let him having the
last word if you don't answer him. Period. If you answer, for whatever
reason, you don't let him having the last word. There is no way around.
You can tell I'm a liar as you want when your definition doesn't fit the
definition all other use. It doesn't change the fact: you don't let him
have the last word. You can pretend otherwise as much as you want, it's
a simple definition in which your claims don't fit.
There's not one thing wrong with plonking someone but
No. Anyone can plonk anyone you want for the reason you want. I agree.
choosing to read and respond to the them when they get quoted.
So it means you don't plonk them. If you ignore someone, you just don't
read and answer. It's very simple. Even I can understand that. How can a
superior being like you be unable to understand that?
I enjoy slapping-around stupid trolls, in moderation.
You enjoy what you want: I don't care. It's just when you claim things
and do different things, it's obvious. You cal call everyone stating the
obvious liar and inferior being, it changes nothing: you are searching
more for excuses than for accuracy.
Why the fsck do think I'm here?
I don't know why you are here and frankly: I don't give a damn. And you
should learn proper English, too. You are still unable to spell correctly
the only word you know: fuck. You could try to find another word if you
don't like this word. I'm learning English reading native English
speakers and if they are to limited to spell the word they chose to use
correctly, it's more difficult to improve. So if you are the superior
being you claim to be, improve.
Get this through your head: For me it's not as simple as "I will read
everything you post" or "I will read nothing that you post".
If you pretend to plonk someone, it should be.
Stop embarrassing yourself, "Stéphane". You can't beat me. I'm
better than you.
It's a little bit better than your last (snipped, unread) answer but not
by much. A superior being should be able to do better. Try again.
-- Si vous avez du temps à perdre :https://scarpet42.gitlab.io