Sujet : Re: ******** Video: FOSS Superiority Versus Commercial Software **********
De : ff (at) *nospam* linux.rocks (Farley Flud)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 29. Nov 2024, 15:58:31
Autres entêtes
Organisation : UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Message-ID : <pan$a2e6e$627c44eb$34e8d200$2b12095c@linux.rocks>
References : 1 2
On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:30:59 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:
I have a feeling it was a matter of default interval. Wolfram, by
default, may have used 6 times shorter intervals in computing the dots,
giving 6 times more dots to find.
I did not use default values.
The Mathematica code specifies "PlotPoints --> 50" which means to initially
use 50 sample points in each direction (x,y,z). However, the algorithm
may change this in a recursive manner.
With MathMod, I specified "Grid": ["500"] which I believe means 500 points
in each direction, but the MathMod documentation is not ideal (this is
expected of a single author FOSS project).
Also, the plotting algorithms may differ and they probably do.
Mathematica does not publish its algorithms and I would have to read the
MathMod source code to discover its algorithm.
-- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.