Re: Ubuntu

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:

You might work around that [Microsoft's nefarious practices] by saying it's "with one's knowledge", but
that's the whole fucking point, you don't really have a choice. 

>
You have the choice to not use Windows if you don't like their data
collection policies.
>
I don't like that they extract anything whatsoever from my computer:
it's none of their business.  Or that they try to make you sign in to an
MS account just to login to your damn computer.
>
It's conceivable there could come a day when I won't tolerate some MS
policy or another, and switch to Macs or Linux.  Unlikely but possible.
>

You can consent or not, they're going to do it anyway. 

>
Prove it.

The way Win10 20H2 performed on my old computer proves they're up to
no good.  Thus, they are guilty until proven otherwise, on any of
these issues.

That's M$ Winblows.  And you're peachy with that.

>
You're peachy with making up bullshit.

So you say, but you just admitted they do things even you dislike.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.