Re: Two points

rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:

On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 05:44:38 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>

I’m sure the market likes them a lot, but the market cannot change the
laws of physics either: I can always do more with the resources of a
desktop than I can with an equivalently-specced laptop, if I don’t need
the mobility of the latter.

>
Doesn't 'equivalently-specced' imply the same 'resources'?

Certainly with Linux it would, a sleek, no-nonsense OS, where Mint
exceeds Win11 in ease and functionality, and can run on far less
hardware without sacrificing too much in performance.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.