Sujet : Re: Damning With Faint Praise
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 05. Dec 2024, 04:36:12
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <hq72ljdavskqarkh9jj3ilhd1s4siuv9cd@4ax.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
What is it with these Windows 10 users so hard up to “upgrade” to
Windows 11? Do they really believe they are missing out on something?
Do they think their ongoing dissatisfaction with their OS can be
remedied, if only they go up just one more version?
>
It was amusing to read this report
<https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/12/microsoft-reiterates-non-negotiable-tpm-2-0-requirement-for-windows-11/>
about the ongoing attempts to come up with hacks to get around
Microsoft’s restrictions on “unsupported” machines upgrading. The best
thing the writer could find to say about Windows 11 was
>
... but aside from that, Windows 11 usually runs about as well on
these PCs as Windows 10 did.
People who know use Linux, or they pay to chase meeting M$'s hardware
requirements and they keep using Winblows, or they even put up with
running cumulative updates on a Win10 box with no SSD..
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.