Re: Two points

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Two points
De : recscuba_google (at) *nospam* huntzinger.com (-hh)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 05. Dec 2024, 17:25:00
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <visk4s$1mraa$3@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 12/4/24 11:13 PM, DFS wrote:
On 12/3/2024 8:15 AM, -hh wrote:
On 12/3/24 1:15 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 00:05:44 -0500, -hh wrote:
>
On 12/2/24 9:19 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 20:19:41 -0500, -hh wrote:
>
... I can recall doing some 3D FEA work back in 2002 and the best PC
workstations we could get would hit the wall & crash at 4 days.
>
Running what OS? Sounds like Windows rather than Linux or some other
*nix.
>
TBH, I don't really remember many details anymore ...
>
Funny, that. Given the era, I’m going to conclude that “I don’t remember” means “Microsoft Windows”.
>
No, we had Linux in the office, so I can't be definitive.
>
Recall what I said: the 'stolen' workstations came with people.  I was happy to get more bodies and be able to delegate the ankle-biter stuff, rather than to have to add it to my already full plate.  There's only so long that one can work 100 hours/week before it takes a toll/ER visit.
 Not a chance.  I never buy it when people claim they work 80+ hours per week.
 100 hours?  Pure bullshit.  That's 16 hours a day, 6 days a week, plus another half-day.
It was 7 days/week, roughly 6:30am-9pm daily.  I lasted about 3 weeks before the body broke down.

Even a 60-hour workweek is a lot: 10-12 hours per day 5-6 days a week.
Certainly is.  That's what I was able to notch it down to after I got more staff (& after the Doc said "take 3 days off" - I took just 24hrs); it was stupid but necessary; I still have occasional flare-ups from it.
-hh

Date Sujet#  Auteur
29 Nov 24 * Two points26vallor
29 Nov 24 +- Re: Two points1Joel
29 Nov 24 `* Re: Two points24Lawrence D'Oliveiro
1 Dec 24  +* Re: Two points20-hh
2 Dec 24  i`* Re: Two points19Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Dec 24  i +* Re: Two points17-hh
2 Dec 24  i i`* Re: Two points16Lawrence D'Oliveiro
2 Dec 24  i i +* Re: Two points2rbowman
2 Dec 24  i i i`- Re: Two points1Joel
2 Dec 24  i i `* Re: Two points13-hh
3 Dec 24  i i  `* Re: Two points12Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Dec 24  i i   +* Re: Two points7-hh
3 Dec 24  i i   i`* Re: Two points6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Dec 24  i i   i `* Re: Two points5-hh
3 Dec 24  i i   i  `* Re: Two points4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Dec 24  i i   i   `* Re: Two points3-hh
5 Dec 24  i i   i    `* Re: Two points2DFS
5 Dec 24  i i   i     `- Re: Two points1-hh
3 Dec 24  i i   `* Re: Two points4candycanearter07
3 Dec 24  i i    `* Re: Two points3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
3 Dec 24  i i     +- Re: Two points1DFS
3 Dec 24  i i     `- Re: Two points1candycanearter07
2 Dec 24  i `- Re: Two points1Joel
2 Dec 24  `* Re: Two points3vallor
2 Dec 24   +- Re: Two points1rbowman
3 Dec 24   `- Re: Two points1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal