Re: Damning With Faint Praise

DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:

[The reason] you would have to have Windows because of some incredible app is
only true for things you really can't live without, that could exist
in the Unix world too, things you'd give up by using Windows.

>
My point isn't that you have to have Windows.  My point is to see what
happens when a cola Linux advocate is forced to compile an app from source.
>
So far you ran away.  Why?

 
You can choose Wintendo or you can choose to be selective in what you
use with Linux.  Trust me, we get by.  Can't wish for M$ back.

>
Afraid to compile an app?
>
You promised Linux leetness, man!

You act as if compiling is such a requirement.  Maybe it is with this
app, but that shows why I don't need every app.

--
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.