Sujet : Re: ******** Video: FOSS Superiority Versus Commercial Software **********
De : ff (at) *nospam* linux.rocks (Farley Flud)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 06. Dec 2024, 23:10:56
Autres entêtes
Organisation : UsenetExpress - www.usenetexpress.com
Message-ID : <pan$aa410$d31f9d20$435d27d4$20bb7374@linux.rocks>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
On Fri, 6 Dec 2024 14:55:39 -0600, Physfitfreak wrote:
If there was a distro of linux for computers that would make installing
programs as easy as it is on android phones, then Windows would get
forgotten fast.
>
No. Not really.
Microslop is very popular in the corporate world with the total
ignoramuses therein. Microslop has $billions to develop an idiot-proof
GUI and FOSS just can't compete with those $billions.
Yet in spite of the comparative "poverty" of FOSS developers, they
have managed to create extremely powerful software, but such software
requires above-average skills to utilize properly.
It is the same with Apphole, where $billions are spent to develop
idiot-proof GUIs for sound and video production. Again, FOSS
developers cannot compete with those $billions but, again, they
have managed to create extremely powerful software, but yet again
such software requires above-average skills to utilize properly.
It is the billion-dollar GUIs alone that separates commercial software
from FOSS.
In knowledgeable hands (like mine), however, FOSS is equal if not
outright superior to any commercial offering.
Example:
I have done contract work for professional photography studios
using only GNU/Linux tools and the results were far better than
could ever be accomplished with that junk Photoshop.
-- Systemd: solving all the problems that you never knew you had.