Re: Supplemental groups count in Linux

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Supplemental groups count in Linux
De : vallor (at) *nospam* cultnix.org (vallor)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 08. Dec 2024, 08:31:59
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lrl0bfF16jfU4@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Pan/0.161 (Hmm2; be402cc9; Linux-6.12.3)
On Sun, 8 Dec 2024 06:55:25 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <vj3fss$3l3q8$5@dont-email.me>:

On 8 Dec 2024 05:12:19 GMT, vallor wrote:
 
Conclusion:  Linux is a modern OS, with much more administrative
flexibility.  Complex user-sharing configurations can be set up --
encompassing, if needed, thousands of supplemental groups.
 
Linux is the only real “industrial-strength” OS fit for the 21st
century.

Well, when it comes to supplemental groups, I'm not so sure...I suspect
it might be a 32-bit field on Windows, but I don't have a Windows
machine to check that on.

--
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.12.3 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
   "He's dead, Jim. Get his ears! - Spock"

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Dec 24 * Supplemental groups count in Linux8vallor
8 Dec 24 +* Re: Supplemental groups count in Linux4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
8 Dec 24 i`* Re: Supplemental groups count in Linux3vallor
9 Dec 24 i `* Re: Supplemental groups count in Linux2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
9 Dec 24 i  `- Re: Supplemental groups count in Linux1vallor
9 Dec 24 `* Re: Supplemental groups count in Linux3DFS
9 Dec 24  `* Re: Supplemental groups count in Linux2vallor
9 Dec 24   `- Re: Supplemental groups count in Linux1DFS

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal