Sujet : Re: Wish me luck
De : joelcrump (at) *nospam* gmail.com (Joel)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 09. Dec 2024, 01:45:51
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <a8fcljp2otsidm658f0so041fnr0n0rkj7@4ax.com>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
User-Agent : ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
DFS <
guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
That's what my system said for the past couple months. 24H2 general
release has been around since Oct 1 2024, but I turned off 'Get the
latest updates as soon as they're available' and waited for it to come
to me.
>
This article describes how MS is rolling it out in phases:
>
https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/is-your-pc-getting-the-windows-11-version-24h2-in-june-or-september-2024
>
>
MS haters in Montana are put at the back of the line.
I would have already installed it, even if I were concerned about
bugs, if they would build on the bloat of 23H2 with buggy general
releases (how many times now?),
>
What you just said makes no sense.
Incorrect, an OS judge updates immediately.
why should I not switch to Linux,
>
Considering you spend most of your computing time running Windows apps,
you haven't actually switched to Linux and suffered with the poor choice
you made.
Considering that I *DON'T* "spend most of my computing time running
Windows apps", your comment is evasive.
which I'm starting to wonder how you can not wish to?
>
Running Linux means giving up MS Office (never unless something just as
good is available on Linux) and Notepad++ (difficult but not impossible
to give up), and maybe a few games.
>
I assume my Canon MG 5220 printer will work under Linux. I don't have
any Windows-only hardware (is that even a thing any more?).
Office is one thing. But you have to get tired of bloatware.
-- Joel W. CrumpAmendment XIVSection 1.[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent. States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.