Sujet : Re: Then there's PATH_MAX
De : vallor (at) *nospam* cultnix.org (vallor)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 10. Dec 2024, 11:29:24
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <lrqjg4Ft7poU2@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Pan/0.161 (Hmm2; be402cc9; Linux-6.12.4)
On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 04:41:01 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<
ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <
vj8got$qq2p$2@dont-email.me>:
On Mon, 9 Dec 2024 22:42:48 -0500, DFS wrote:
Surely you know NTFS supports file paths up to 32,767 characters?
HAHAHAHAHA!!!!
<https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14500893/is-the-255-char-limit-for-
filenames-on-windows-and-unix-the-whole-path-or-part>
Interesting how the OS doesn't measure up to the (alleged) filesystem
design.
-- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.12.4 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G