Sujet : MacOS Sequoia vs. Linux Mint
De : vallor (at) *nospam* cultnix.org (vallor)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 13. Dec 2024, 16:40:28
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <ls32rcFprp3U1@mid.individual.net>
User-Agent : Pan/0.161 (Hmm2; be402cc9; Linux-6.12.4)
So upgraded the Mac Studio to Sequoia:
$ uname -a
Darwin Mac 24.2.0 Darwin Kernel Version 24.2.0:
Fri Dec 6 18:56:34 PST 2024; root:xnu-11215.61.5~2/RELEASE_ARM64_T6020 arm64
After the initial upgrade from Sonoma, it still had updates
to apply. This took a while, and included the need for
another reboot -- all to update some xcode crap.
It's a lot easier to update Linux than Windows or MacOS. Why
it would be such a pain for MacOS to do a simple update, I can
only guess at.
(I suspect it may be that MacOS doesn't have a facility
with the simplicity of Linux's ldconfig(8) for updating
shared libraries.)
Also:
_[/Users/scott/path_max]_(
scott@Mac)🍏_
$ make use_pathconf
cc -g -O2 -std=c90 -Wall -Werror -pedantic use_pathconf.c -o use_pathconf
_[/Users/scott/path_max]_(
scott@Mac)🍏_
$ ./use_pathconf
1024
It's still 1/4 that of Linux.
Although, I did run a find(1) on my fileserver for long pathnames, and
found that the longest was 359 characters...so MacOS would be fine with
that. Windows? Not so sure.
-- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.12.4 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G "Friends come and go, enemies accumulate."