Sujet : Re: MacOS Sequoia vs. Linux Mint
De : ronb02NOSPAM (at) *nospam* gmail.com (RonB)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 14. Dec 2024, 17:21:36
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vjkbaf$28k0$6@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2024-12-14, CrudeSausage <
crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Le 2024-12-13 à 22:07, DFS a écrit :
On 12/13/2024 10:40 AM, vallor wrote:
It's a lot easier to update Linux than Windows or MacOS.
Maybe, maybe not.
The massive update to Win11 24H2 was a few mouse clicks. Absolutely no
other user input was required.
>
Actually, I would challenge Scotty the Hutt's accessment there. If you
update daily, Linux is vastly superior to Windows in that area. However,
if you're like my wife and reject updates months at a time, there is a
great chance that you will damage your operating system the moment you
decide to go through with them on the Linux side. Windows is generally
better with seldom-used machines.
I'll challenge that statement. I know better. I've updated many Linux
machines after months of not turning them on. Even "ancient" computers from
pre-2010 update quickly and cleanly when using Linux and fast Internet.
As I've mentioned before (several times) this assumes you're using a
business machine with an Intel GPU. I have read about (not personally
experienced) issues with Nvidia GPUs and Linux upgrades. But I've also seen
upgrades cause BSODs in my wife's laptop that used a Nvidia (I always just
disabled the Nvidia GPU, since it also had an Intel GPU) — so I'm putting
some of that on Nvidia.
-- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien