Sujet : Re: MacOS Sequoia vs. Linux Mint
De : sc (at) *nospam* fiat-linux.fr (Stéphane CARPENTIER)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 14. Dec 2024, 23:37:29
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Mulots' Killer
Message-ID : <675e08a9$0$16832$426a34cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Le 14-12-2024, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <
ldo@nz.invalid> a écrit :
>
Remember that Linux distros like Debian have integrated package
management. That means there is no “hope for the best” -- it knows exactly
what is currently there, what needs to be removed, what needs to be
updated, and what needs to be added.
Tell that to LP/FR/NV/whatever who can't update a simple tool like
Midnight Commander without breaking it.
This is why you don’t even need to do a reboot if it is sufficient to
simply stop and start the affected services.
It's not that right. I don't reboot after most of my updates, but when
the kernel is updated, without a reboot, some things, like plugging an
usb device, don't work. Maybe I would be able to fix it without a reboot,
but the reboot is faster than any time I would need to investigate. So
for me, the best way is to refuse updates, if they include the kernel
updates, before shutting down my computer.
-- Si vous avez du temps à perdre :https://scarpet42.gitlab.io