Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025

On 12/22/24 11:19 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:

Le 2024-12-22 à 09:24, -hh a écrit :

On 12/22/24 12:41 AM, RonB wrote:

On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

Le 2024-12-21 à 17:42, RonB a écrit :

On 2024-12-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

Le 2024-12-21 à 02:47, RonB a écrit :

On 2024-12-20, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:

Le 2024-12-20 à 16:57, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :

Le 20-12-2024, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit :

Le 2024-12-20 à 15:37, Stéphane CARPENTIER a écrit :

Le 20-12-2024, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :

>
Open source is not profit driven.

>
Tell that to Red Hat.

>
It's the support not the software that makes Red Hat money.

>
Not only. With the support comes some tools developed by Red Hat. There
is no clear cut between the part in Red Hat that makes money and the
part in Red Hat that contributes to open source. The part that
contribute to open source help them to make money with the parts that
sell support. And the part that makes money with support help them to
pay for the part that contribute to open source. You wouldn't have one
without the other.

>
You might be right, I'll concede that much. I just know that I would
never use anything either IBM or Red Hat makes through the pedophile
fruitcakes they employ.

>
But the "pedophile fruitcakes" are a-okay at Microsoft?

>
Microsoft hires progressives, but not pedophiles. Pedophiles are too
busy trying to get dates with 13-year-olds using ElementaryOS to get the
university degrees necessary to get hired at Microsoft.

>
Right. And it's "nice" that you believe that about Microsoft's Woke
"progressives." (They're fuzzy and warm, unlike the Woke "progressives" in
the Linux world. This transgender crap has one purpose, to give kids the
"right" to make their own sexual decisions so pedophile perverts can have
sex with kids.) Funny how people can shunt their brains when they become
fanboi partisans for a specific product.

>
I'm not saying that the pedophiles at Microsoft are any more moral than
the ones in the Linux world; I'm saying that they are at the very least
university graduates. The work Microsoft demands from them also doesn't
afford them much time to diddle children whereas open-source developers
have lots of free time because they usually make their own schedules.

>
Bullshit. Universities are where this Woke bullshit brainwashing is
inculcated. If you really think Microsoft is "superior" because they (may)
have more college graduates, then you're more deluded than I thought.

>
Has RonB ever been able to clearly define what 'Woke' actually is?

 The belief that the White man is responsible for all of society's problems, ...

Because that posture allows you to play the VICTIM card instead of honestly acknowledging that there's been longstanding systematic advantages to being white (& male) over others...and you want to maintain your status quo of being advantaged.

...that blacks are not responsible for any of the issues that consistently surround them, that non-White cultures should be allowed free entry into whichever Western nation and be given continuous welfare, ...

Which you know are fictitious claims, especially since US immigration policy even since 1964 has highly favored white Europeans over others: see Chinese Exclusion Act.

that Whites should be dead last in the selection process for promotions or positions, that White as a race should be destroyed through the promotion of interbreeding, that homosexuals are oppressed, that homosexuality should get equal representation in media despite being a minuscule fraction of the population, that equality is not sufficient and that society should instead strive for equity...

Because it wasn't because of Equity that the US got CoVid checks? /s

...all of which are meant to destabilize society much like they were during the cultural revolution in China to facilitate entry of Communism.

Destabilizes?  No, that's not what such a policy does; try again.

It should also be noted that being reluctant to live in a community with the people mentioned above or their advocates is White supremacy, as is the desire to not be mugged, see your wife raped or your child kidnapped or murdered by those same people. In fact, refusing to allow your taxes to be used to pay for the people above rather than to maintain roads or help out brave men who served your country is also White supremacy.

Or - you're simply trying to redefine what wealth-based 'class' is, and contriving an excuse for why you shouldn't have to pay a fair share of taxes to society.

RonB is free to disagree with what I said. Let me just say, however, that I am not interested in any of the dozen links you'll send me as a rebuttal. Communism, Communists and useful progressive idiots and their opinions will not change my mind. The more progressive you are, the closer you are to Corky in Life Goes On, except that he seemed like a fun dude.

Typically, I provide links to preemptively STFU lying assholes and hypocrites;  that you're offended by them shows that it works.

You know ... critical thinking, not propaganda.

 Like the critical thinking you routinely refuse to do by pasting links rather than expressing your opinion in a comprehensible way. 

Not my fault that you only comprehend at a 5th grade reading level.

You are free to use your barrage of progressive propaganda as a crutch for the opinion they've inserted into your head, but we are also free to refuse to read any of them because we've already seen your shpiel in 1989 <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JVcbY3Tf_TE&pp=ygUKY29ya3kgcmFwcw%3D%3D>

Whatever deluded fantasy lets you get through the day, snowflake.
BTW, you inevitably don't know (nor care) that Harvard University's origination of a 'Diversity' policy a century ago was actually an attempt to restore the Status Quo favoritism for the traditional protestant while male Anglo Saxons in student admissions:
It was done in response to how an "undesirable minority" had been beating white men on Harvard's --> merits only <-- admissions test, and had risen to ~20% of the student population.
I'd provide the cites, but you've claimed to be offended by them...
-hh