Re: A New Machine Progresses. The Shakedown Phase.

Le 28-12-2024, Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> a écrit :

On 28 Dec 2024 21:48:52 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>

 
In fact, you are using it [UEFI], but you don't have enough knowledge in
computer to be aware of it.
>

>
Try again, Carpenter.

It's not necessary.

My knowledge of computer booting is way beyond anything that
you'll ever know.

Yes, but no. Any of your message proves otherwise. Your knowledge is
below any newbie would have acquired in a month. And you didn't passed
this level in years. You are either the shame of a Linux defender or the
pride of a Windows aficionado.

The option for legacy booting exists and it will exist despite
you feeble exhortations about the "future."

Don't care. It's an option in the UEFI boot, so it's still UEFI. Your
willingness to accept it or not is of no matter. You are wrong: the case
is closed.

What an ignoramus idiot!

You are too limited. You pretend to be an artist: prove it. Improve.

Starting to boot in legacy mode is still
booting the UEFI. It's only booting with limited capacities,

>
What fucking "capacities" do you want?

Once again, I already answered that: the possibility to boot directly my
Linux Kernel without the need of a bloated boot manager. But you can't
understand what a simple boot is.

Just load the fucking Linux kernel and then get out of the
fucking way.  Very, very simple.

Yes, exactly, why do you ask if you know the answer?

Legacy booting does that just fine.

No way. The BIOS didn't managed that, it was brought by the UEFI. If you
are able to do it without the need of a boot manager, it's because you
are not in legacy mode. And I don't care if you believe you have enabled
it.

And really, I know Linux, but I have only the most limited knowledge
possible about BIOS/UEFI. I don't care about hardware and I learn only
what's vital for me to use it. So, if you know less than me, it's a
miracle you are able to use your new computer.

Your arguments are totally asinine.

They mostly prove you don't know what you are doing. And they prove I
was right to be surprised when you said your new computer is working
well.

I already told you so, but you'd rather refuse reality than learn.

>
Yes, you told me before.  But I NEVER listen to a fucking idiot.

First I refuse your badge of honor. You want to insult me, fine, I'm
willing to be insulted by you. But not endlessly with the only word in
your limited vocabulary. You are lying about everything, included your
claim of being an artist. Any artist would be able to be more varied in
his insults.

Second, as I already told you: it's not what I am which is important,
but what I say. The important thing is you can't check about what I am
and if I rely only about what I am, I can make mistakes. But. The.
Important. Thing. Is: you can check about what I say. And then, you can
either prove me wrong or improve. But your inability to check proves
your inability to learn. You'll stay a newbie forever. Or a Windows
aficionado pretending to promote Linux in the only purpose of making
Linux users looking like fools.

And that's I believe the most probable: you are a Windows (or maybe
Apple) user using Linux only to show issues about it. When you are the
only issue. Even DFS, who is a Windows confirmed aficionado, knows more
about Linux than you. And it tells a lot about you being a forever Linux
beginner. The only explanations are either you have an IQ below your
anal temperature (in Celsius Degree, which is about 37°C) or you are a
Windows user. The first possibility could explain you being in an
asylum. But your Internet access should have to be explained. The second
explanation is more probable because you acknowledge to Windows a lot.

The virtual machine (VT-d) is out as well (only a fucking
asshole uses virtual machines).

 
Yes, the world is moving forward when you stay in the past (doesn't it
ring a bell?).

>
The BIOS provides the option to disable VT-d.

No. The UEFI does that. Try to learn the basics.

The BIOS does not

Exist anymore. It's UEFI, right now. You can keep your shit in front of
your eyes, it changes nothing: you don't understand what you are saying.

attach a warning that disabling the VT-d will violate the future.

So what? You are the only one stuck in the past. But I'll tel you a
secret. To send a message from your computer to Usenet, a lot of VM are
used. So, you are using VM even pretending not to. The only way to avoid
VM is to be cut of the outside world.

You are a total imbecile!

No. It's not enough. Improve your insults. For real.

There will no SSDs on this machine.  Never. HDDs only.

 
Yes, the world is moving forward when you stay in the past

>
Yes, and HDD manufacturers will keep on manufacturing HDDs
well into the future.

What's the future? One week? One year? One century? The only reason HDD
are still available is because they are cheaper than SSD for huge
storage. But once the price of SSD decrease they are replaced.

SSDs are NOT the future.

They are the present. I don't read the future, I don't know what new
technology will be discovered in the future. So I don't know what is the
future. But I know the HDD are the past and either they will be replaced
by SSD or by something waiting to happen.

They are merely an option for uninformed

You don't know what information is.

idiots like you.

Once again, I refuse your badge of honor: improve. Stop pretending.
Start improving, don't stay that limited in everything, including your
insults.

Because the only possibility to fine
tune a kernel seriously is to try a lot of options and to benchmark
every choice.

>
Give it up, Carpenter.

You just admit failure, why should I continue?

You are a helpless distro lackey and you will always be a helpless
distro lackey.

It changes nothing about you lying about customizing your kernel.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io