Sujet : Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
De : wNOSPAMp (at) *nospam* gmail.org (pH)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 01. Jan 2025, 06:06:25
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vl2igh$2l8ho$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2024-12-30, D <
nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
>
On Sun, 29 Dec 2024, pH wrote:
>
On 2024-12-28, D <nospam@example.net> wrote:
>
>
On Fri, 27 Dec 2024, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>
On 2024-12-27 18:04, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Fri, 27 Dec 2024 14:57:55 +0100, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>
Well, I appreciate that I can get gratis a piece of software that is
that good.
>
If you think Free Software could be better, and you would rather not give
money to a proprietary company, why not contribute some of that money to
the development of the Free Software and help make it better?
>
Especially since projects like KDE and LibreOffice really need it.
>
>
Note that money is not the only way to contribute. Even by using the
software you contribute, by making others aware of it, you contribute. I
actually like projects that are not super wealthy. The linux foundation
and firefox are excellent examples of how power corrupts. Would never
dream of contributing with money to those two.
>
This grabs my attention...as essentially a 'bystander' I've been totally
unaware of these types of sentiments.
Can someone give (or point me to) a thumbnail of why someone might have
these opinions?
>
Just curious....
>
Pureheart in Aptos
>
Sure... https://lunduke.substack.com/ writes plenty about the corruption
of firefox and the linux foundation.
Thank-you for the link...
pH
GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1