Sujet : Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
De : OFeem1987 (at) *nospam* teleworm.us (Chris Ahlstrom)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.misc comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 03. Jan 2025, 13:11:09
Autres entêtes
Organisation : None
Message-ID : <vl8k55$3sko8$5@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Carlos E.R. wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On 2025-01-02 21:06, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
On 2025-01-02 14:42, rbowman wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 08:36:41 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
>
I find GNOME rather clunky whereas KDE, at least on Fedora and Nobara,
is perfect out of the box. I imagine that a lot of people who try out
Linux and face GNOME are going to wonder how to do the basics, and they
will likely find that the way extensions work is rather clunky,
especially during upgrades. Meanwhile, KDE is very familiar and offers a
ton of features they could only dream of in Windows like the desktop
effects, theming options and widgets. Unlike Cinnamon too, the widgets
in KDE actually work as they should.
>
The Ubuntu box has GNOME. I live with it but I'm not a fan. I'd rather
have a menu structure rather than the 'Show Applications' button that
brings up three or four screens of unsorted stuff.
GNOME was designed with the belief that anyone looking for an
application will press the Windows key and then type the name of what
they're looking for rather than select it from a menu. That's how I do
it whether I use Windows, GNOME or KDE so I would agree with their
design choice.
>
What if you are new and don't know the name of the applications?
As time goes on, *some* will learn.
-- There be sober men a'plenty, and drunkards barely twenty; there are menof over ninety who have never yet kissed a girl. But give me the ramblingrover, from Orkney down to Dover, we will roam the whole world over, andtogether we'll face the world. -- Andy Stewart, "After the Hush"
GIMP 3.0.0-RC1
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1