Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1

On 1/10/25 5:20 PM, in a futile face-saving attempt chrisv wrote:

-hh wrote:
 

chrisv wrote:

-hh wrote:

>
Prediction: a very brave "(snipped, unread)" is immanent!
>

(snip stuff from the same guy who defended censorship because it
was by "private companies" who were being told to do it by the
Biden administration)

>
Golly, I didn't expect a "Whataboutism" attempt!

 I sure didn't expect you to man-up and admit that you were wrong on
the censorship issue.

False, for I made no such comment on this old topic that you've dredged up.  All I did was to note that you're trying to change the subject.
Now the prior subject was on your paranoid rant about government restricting freedoms, for which my comments are summarized as follows:
* I corrected you on a technology which you claimed was 'proof'; your reply to which was that maybe it had changed since I worked on it;
* Corrected you on EE power infrastructure cost principles, debunking your claim that it was associated only with being 'green' (its not);
* Corrected your squeamishness on animal proteins.  BTW, here's that 'wiggling food' video I mentioned ... enjoy being culturally repulsed:
<https://photo-hh.com/2023/it_moves.mov>
* Corrected your deflection attempt that was trying to hide a hypocrite.
Noted that you've deflected by censoring (now twice & counting) on:
* I corrected your surrender attempt on mining costs/externalities;
* Corrected your false helplessness claim on geopolitical economics;
* Corrected your claim of concern: its a dildo of consequences of the very personal freedoms you claim to want:  its YA hypocrisy example of chrisv where he attempts to "have your cake & eat it too".

Some of us value freedom more than others, obviously.

>
Where said "some of us" excluded chrisv, as he censored his reply.

 That's a lie.  I censored nothing.  Your full post is available for
anyone to read.

Nope, you've attempted to do so by snipping portions in your reply.

Your response will be deleted, unread.

Ah, so there's the very brave "(snipped, unread)" as was predicted!
And FYI:  its another instance of an attempt by you to be a censor.
-hh