Sujet : Re: Kilowatts
De : vallor (at) *nospam* cultnix.org (vallor)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 15. Jan 2025, 17:38:52
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <luq6ksFfc8fU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
User-Agent : Pan/0.161 (Hmm2; c45f6052; Linux-6.12.9)
On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 16:26:51 +0000, Farley Flud <
ff@linux.rocks> wrote in
<
pan$b5c74$65460671$b69b76f0$73f9a684@linux.rocks>:
On 15 Jan 2025 14:22:29 GMT, vallor wrote:
Is this a dipole?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhombic_antenna
>
>
Yes, it is. But a dummy like you could never tell.
A Rhombic is merely 2 V-antennas connected end-to-end and a V-antenna is
... guess what ... a dipole.
Give it up, loser. You haven't a leg to stand on.
If -- as you claim -- every antenna is a "dipole", then what
use is there in the term?
I think this is another of your sophomoric semantics arguments.
So...is this a dipole?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopole_antenna-- -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti OS: Linux 6.12.9 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G "A day without radiation is a day without sunshine."