Sujet : Re: Manjaro
De : ronb02NOSPAM (at) *nospam* gmail.com (RonB)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 17. Jan 2025, 08:04:44
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmcvec$3ugvi$4@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
On 2025-01-17, Peter Dean <
p.dean@invalid.net> wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 1/16/25 12:13 AM, Peter Dean wrote:
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
Why the heck would anyone use anything else?
>
1) NVIDIA is supported out of the box and works perfectly.
2) Wake from suspend works consistently.
3) Unlike Fedora, waking from sleep won't maximize brightness before
turning off the backlight entirely.
4) Unlike Ubuntu-based distributions like Pop!_OS, opening up an
application doesn't momentarily freeze the computer.
>
Seriously, does anyone know of an issue with this distribution? I can't
yet find one.
>
Manjaro is pointless. Just use arch.
As it is, Manjaro is robust and user-friendly. Arch makes no guarantee
to its stability and is anything but friendly to the user.
>
You have that backwards. Your Manjaro is far more likely to break than arch.
And user friendly? What does that even mean?
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KyADkmRVe0U
It means it's easier to install and maintain. I have zero problems with
Linux Mint and I can install it and upgrade it in 20 minutes.
-- “Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good.” —J.R.R. Tolkien
Re: Manjaro
Re: Manjaro