Sujet : Re: Cult of Unix
De : this (at) *nospam* ddress.is.invalid (Frank Slootweg)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.comp.os.windows-10Date : 17. Jan 2025, 17:46:43
Autres entêtes
Organisation : NOYB
Message-ID : <vme51o.kn0.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
User-Agent : tin/1.6.2-20030910 ("Pabbay") (UNIX) (CYGWIN_NT-10.0-WOW/2.8.0(0.309/5/3) (i686)) Hamster/2.0.2.2
vallor <
vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 02:49:17 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <vmcgfd$3osq8$2@dont-email.me>:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:06:00 -0500, Paul wrote:
You can freeze a copy of C: for example, and run a Robocopy over it.
Until you hit the limitations of Windows and Robocopy, and have to give
up on it and use Linux instead.
<https://www.theregister.com/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/>
I suspect things may have changed in the last *14 years*.
Not to mention that the alleged limitations of Robocopy are bogus.
And to finish it off, it's a perfect example of using the wong tool,
instead of - oh irony - the tool which is the subject of this part of
the thread, as Paul pointed out before and again pointed out in response
to Lawrence' post.