Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity
De : recscuba_google (at) *nospam* huntzinger.com (-hh)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 17. Jan 2025, 21:55:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vmeg4e$68pk$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 1/17/25 11:39 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
Farley Flud wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
 
Wanna good laugh?
>
Fire up Microcrap Excel.  Open a blank workbook and format
a cell as "Date."  (Accept the default display format.)
>
Now in that same cell enter "60."
>
What do you see?  Answer: “February 29, 1900” (or whatever
display format you have chosen).
>
The problem is that Feb 29, 1900 does not exist!
>
The year 1900 is not a leap year!
>
I'm seeing this right in front of me right now and I am using
the very latest version of Microcrap Excel.
>
OMFG!  What junk!
>
I thank John Walker for this:
>
https://www.fourmilab.ch/documents/calendar/
 In LibreOffice, it's just "60". When you apply the "Date" format, the
result is 2/28/00;  or choose the full date format to see the 1900.
Looking into the Excel bug, it actually appears to be more than merely that 2/29/1900 doesn't exist:
Using a value of 1 ... it reports as being 1/1/1900.  Good enough, but it also reports that that was a Sunday.  But calendars report that 1/1/1900 was actually a Monday
Values 2 thru 59:  same as above: the day of the week is off by one.
60:  the Wednesday, 2/29/1900 error
61 & higher:  Thursday 3/1/1900 .. so the day of week is now correct.
-hh

Date Sujet#  Auteur
17 Jan 25 * Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity4Chris Ahlstrom
17 Jan 25 +- Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity1Farley Flud
17 Jan 25 `* Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity2-hh
17 Jan 25  `- Re: M$ Excel Supreme Stupidity1Farley Flud

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal