Sujet : Re: MS Excel Working As Designed
De : sc (at) *nospam* fiat-linux.fr (Stéphane CARPENTIER)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 19. Jan 2025, 00:21:19
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Mulots' Killer
Message-ID : <678c376f$0$12913$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Le 18-01-2025, Joel <
joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :
Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2025 01:00:11 +0000, Tyrone wrote:
>
Going forward - which is what everyone does - the dates are correct. And that
is all that matters.
>
Speak for yourself, autococksucker.
>
A lot of non-assholes, such as historians, economists, astronomers, etc. may
want to work with historical dates.
>
Spreadsheets are not just for brain-dead business people.
>
I would rather use LO, but for many reasons beyond how 1900 is
treated.
Of course, in real life nobody need to care about it. The historians may
need to use dates in 1900's without having difficulties around that. For
the astronomers and economists, I'd like to know how they would have
wrong results.
-- Si vous avez du temps à perdre :https://scarpet42.gitlab.io