Sujet : Re: Microsoft to force new Outlook on Windows 10 PCs
De : sc (at) *nospam* fiat-linux.fr (Stéphane CARPENTIER)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 19. Jan 2025, 00:30:59
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Mulots' Killer
Message-ID : <678c39b3$0$16848$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Le 18-01-2025, Joel <
joelcrump@gmail.com> a écrit :
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
>
I reject the Win platform as a dead end.
>
Windows will long outlive you and all the other doomsday cola advocates.
Explain how to keep up with demands on hardware without replacing
motherboard every three years. "Don't upgrade to Win12" only supports
my point.
>
Total absurd bullshit.
>
You have NEVER needed to upgrade/replace your mobo every 3 years for a
new version of Windows.
>
As I've requested several times, make sure to keep your current hardware
around so I can rub your Linuxy face in it when Win13 installs and runs
just fine on it.
>
And yet I already felt advancing 11 wasn't great.
It wasn't his point. He wasn't saying if you would be able to run it or
not. Which isn't the same. And for that, I'm not that sure but I can't
read the future. What I know is when Vista was out, they claimed that
they were doing 3D when the only thing that was in 3D was the [Alt][TAB]
combination. When my computer was to old to run Vista, it was running
Ubuntu with compiz smoothly, which was real 3D. Then, when Windows 10
was out, you needed to have a recent computer, not because it needed
power, but because it needed secure boot which didn't exist in old
computers. And I see a lot of old computers on which Linux was able to
give a second life when Windows was too slow.
So, maybe your actual computer will be able to run the last version of
Windows in twenty years. I don't know, I don't even care, but history
proves otherwise.
-- Si vous avez du temps à perdre :https://scarpet42.gitlab.io