Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech
De : mummycullen (at) *nospam* gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 07. Feb 2025, 19:12:20
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <YCOdnafZddyZ0Dv6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com>
References : 1
User-Agent : newsSync 683382704
Joel wrote:
mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) wrote:
RonB wrote:
 This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664
 I typed in "Micheal Jackson" about four times in the
"checker
box" and it
wouldn't let me in, so I won't be trying to follow this link either. What a
stupid verification system.
 Perhaps you could quote the pertinent parts?
 Check your spelling
  I spelled it right and it didn't work for me, either.
--
Joel W. Crump
 Amendment XIV
Section 1.
 [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
 Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.
If you look at what he posted, he didn't spell it correctly. This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

Date Sujet#  Auteur
7 Feb 25 * Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech2MummyChunk
7 Feb 25 `- Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech1RonB

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal