Re: Lunduke: open-source is anti-free speech

On 2025-02-07, MummyChunk <mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid> wrote:

Joel wrote:
mummycullen@gmail-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (MummyChunk) wrote:

RonB wrote:
 
This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664
 
I typed in "Micheal Jackson" about four times in the

"checker

box" and it
wouldn't let me in, so I won't be trying to follow this link either. What a
stupid verification system.
 
Perhaps you could quote the pertinent parts?
 
Check your spelling

 
 
I spelled it right and it didn't work for me, either.
 
--
Joel W. Crump
 
Amendment XIV
Section 1.
 
[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.
 
Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.

>
>
>
If you look at what he posted, he didn't spell it correctly.
>
>
This is a response to the post seen at:
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=683345664#683345664

Okay, I tried it again. It keeps looping back to...

Input Verification Required!

Maybe it doesn't like uBlock Origin? If that's the case, oh well.

--
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien