Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1

On Sat, 8 Feb 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

On 08/02/2025 07:36, WokieSux282@ud0s4.net wrote:

IMHO, a lot of this is just "busy work" from
   people looking for something to do. Their
   idea of "better" means "better for ME - and
   screw YOU". It's not better for the average,
   or even professional, user.

>
In my careers - I have had several - us Engineers were humble creatures who wrote clean workmanlike well documented and tested code in the hope that no one would ever have to write it again, and if they did, it would be instantly understandable. Code was. to quote my friend 'Higgy',  'all just bits, in silicon'.
>
Later I encountered computer scientists who spoke a strange language with artistic terms in it like 'elegance' 'intellectual purity' 'algorithmic efficiency'  'Turing complete' 'object oriented' and other words that seemed to have nothing whatever to do with actually writing testing and debugging clean code that met the spec and worked in a timescale less than eternity...
>
I decided they were all frustrated ArtStudents™ with Physics envy who could not  do HardSums™

Haha, brilliant!

And should never be let anywhere near a critical project.

I am fascinated by the fact that when it comes to programming, there can be an enormous disconnect between academic programmers, and a guy in his room who just pounded out the code and got the work done.
I'm not saying he did it in the most "elegant" way or the best documented way, but I do claim that in many instances, the guy without the official training is able to do it.
Reminds me of when I went to university. I often had to help the A students with their practical assignments, and I got it done. On the theory part however, they were always the A students.