Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again
De : sc (at) *nospam* fiat-linux.fr (Stéphane CARPENTIER)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 16. Feb 2025, 10:01:13
Autres entêtes
Organisation : Mulots' Killer
Message-ID : <67b1a959$0$16834$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
User-Agent : slrn/pre1.0.4-9 (Linux)
Le 16-02-2025, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> a écrit :
On 15 Feb 2025 22:03:36 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote
in <67b10f38$0$28493$426a34cc@news.free.fr>:
>
Le 15-02-2025, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> a écrit :
On 15 Feb 2025 11:27:36 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
>
Now, on some systems, like ubuntu, python is managed by the system, so
it refuses to execute a "pip install". And if the library isn't provided
by ubuntu, you have to run "pip install" in a virtual environment to be
able to use a library designed not to be shared with the libraries of
the system.
>
I believe 'sudo pip install xxxxx' will work although I prefer to use
venvs. Installing to the system libs might be preferable for something
like ruff but I still do that in the venv.
 
I can't test it now, but I'm pretty sure it wouldn't work. The error
message was explicit. It didn't said "you don't have the authorisation".
It said something like "the libraries are managed by your distribution
and you should use the package manager of your distribution instead, run
sudo apt install". I'm sure there are ways to force "pip install" to run
anyway, but I strongly believe it would be a bad idea because I have no
idea about the side effects.
>
It also gives instructions on how to set up a venv, which (once I figured out
what that means), seems to work well.

Yes, that's what I said: I had to run it in a virtual environment. So
it's what I said, the official way of using python for a developer is to
use it in a virtual environment. Which means the programmer is expecting
to install the library required by is software and not using the
libraries of the system. It's not my decision, it's, like I said, the
new way: the libraries installed by the system are used by the system
and the libraries installed by the developer are used by the software.
They are not shared anymore and it avoids compatibilities issues.

And it's exactly what snap, appimage and flatpack are doing on a broader
way than python. Like it or not, it's what people are doing now, and
there are reasons behind that.

--
Si vous avez du temps à perdre :
https://scarpet42.gitlab.io

Date Sujet#  Auteur
8 Feb 25 * Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again98RonB
8 Feb 25 `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again97RonB
8 Feb 25  +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again95RonB
9 Feb 25  i+- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1rbowman
10 Feb 25  i`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again93RonB
11 Feb 25  i `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again92RonB
11 Feb 25  i  +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again12rbowman
12 Feb 25  i  i+* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again9rbowman
12 Feb 25  i  ii`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again8rbowman
13 Feb 25  i  ii +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again3RonB
13 Feb 25  i  ii i+- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1vallor
14 Feb 25  i  ii i`- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1RonB
14 Feb 25  i  ii `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
14 Feb 25  i  ii  `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again3Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Feb 25  i  ii   `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Feb 25  i  ii    `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Feb 25  i  i`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2RonB
12 Feb 25  i  i `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1rbowman
12 Feb 25  i  +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again63Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Feb 25  i  i+- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1DFS
12 Feb 25  i  i+- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
12 Feb 25  i  i+- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1vallor
12 Feb 25  i  i+- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1RonB
15 Feb 25  i  i`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again58Stéphane CARPENTIER
15 Feb 25  i  i +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again9rbowman
15 Feb 25  i  i i+* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again6Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i ii+* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again3vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i iii+- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1rbowman
16 Feb 25  i  i iii`- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i ii`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2rbowman
16 Feb 25  i  i ii `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i i`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2rbowman
16 Feb 25  i  i i `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Stéphane CARPENTIER
15 Feb 25  i  i `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again48Lawrence D'Oliveiro
15 Feb 25  i  i  +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again3Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i  i`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Feb 25  i  i  i `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i  `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again44vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i   +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Feb 25  i  i   i`- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i   `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again41pothead
16 Feb 25  i  i    +* Pan (was: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again)3vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i    i+- Re: Pan (was: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again)1pothead
16 Feb 25  i  i    i`- Re: Pan (was: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again)1rbowman
16 Feb 25  i  i    +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again6vallor
17 Feb 25  i  i    i`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Feb 25  i  i    i +* (more on) Pan (was: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again)3vallor
17 Feb 25  i  i    i i`* Re: (more on) Pan (was: Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again)2rbowman
17 Feb 25  i  i    i i `- Re: (more on) Pan1Sn!pe
17 Feb 25  i  i    i `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Feb 25  i  i    `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again31rbowman
16 Feb 25  i  i     `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again30vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i      +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again20rbowman
16 Feb 25  i  i      i`* Agent isn't open source.19vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i      i +* Re: Agent isn't open source.6%
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i+* Re: Agent isn't open source.4Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i      i ii+* Re: Agent isn't open source.2%
17 Feb 25  i  i      i iii`- Re: Agent isn't open source.1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
16 Feb 25  i  i      i ii`- Re: Agent isn't open source.1Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i`- Linux and Pan are open source (was: Re: Agent isn't open source.)1vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i      i +* Re: Agent isn't open source.2Chris Ahlstrom
10 Mar 25  i  i      i i`- Re: Agent isn't open source.1candycanearter07
16 Feb 25  i  i      i +* Re: Agent isn't open source.9Sn!pe
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i`* Re: Agent isn't open source.8vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i +- Re: Agent isn't open source.1%
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i `* [OT] Ice cream (was: Re: Agent isn't open source.)6Sn!pe
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i  +- Re: [OT] Ice cream1%
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i  `* Re: [OT] Ice cream (was: Re: Agent isn't open source.)4vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i      i i   +- Re: [OT] Ice cream1Sn!pe
17 Feb 25  i  i      i i   `* Re: [OT] Ice cream (was: Re: Agent isn't open source.)2rbowman
17 Feb 25  i  i      i i    `- Re: [OT] Ice cream1Physfitfreak
16 Feb 25  i  i      i `- Re: Agent isn't open source.1Physfitfreak
16 Feb 25  i  i      +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again8Chris Ahlstrom
16 Feb 25  i  i      i+* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again6vallor
16 Feb 25  i  i      ii+* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again4%
16 Feb 25  i  i      iii`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again3Adison Vohn Caterson
16 Feb 25  i  i      iii `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2%
16 Feb 25  i  i      iii  `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Adison Vohn Caterson
16 Feb 25  i  i      ii`- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1Stéphane CARPENTIER
16 Feb 25  i  i      i`- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1rbowman
10 Mar 25  i  i      `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1candycanearter07
12 Feb 25  i  `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again16RonB
12 Feb 25  i   +- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1rbowman
13 Feb 25  i   `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again14RonB
13 Feb 25  i    +- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1rbowman
14 Feb 25  i    `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again12RonB
14 Feb 25  i     +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again4rbowman
14 Feb 25  i     i`* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again3vallor
15 Feb 25  i     i `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2rbowman
16 Feb 25  i     i  `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1vallor
14 Feb 25  i     +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2rbowman
15 Feb 25  i     i`- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1rbowman
15 Feb 25  i     `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again5RonB
15 Feb 25  i      `* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again4rbowman
16 Feb 25  i       +* Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again2rbowman
16 Feb 25  i       i`- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1RonB
16 Feb 25  i       `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1RonB
10 Feb 25  `- Re: Hobbyware WinCrap 11 strikes again1candycanearter07

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal