Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms
De : nospam (at) *nospam* needed.invalid (Paul)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.comp.os.windows-11
Date : 16. Feb 2025, 18:40:34
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vot7uh$mm79$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1
User-Agent : Ratcatcher/2.0.0.25 (Windows/20130802)
On Sun, 2/16/2025 6:04 AM, Joel wrote:
https://www.neowin.net/news/microsoft-removes-windows-11-24h2-official-support-on-8th-9th-10th-gen-intel-cpus/
 
 
So, I can still boot Win11 on my box, because it's grandfathered in,
from 2021.  OK.  Great.  Nah, I'll stick with Linux, thanks.
 

Official support means, if you raise a bug that "my 8th gen Intel can't play Solitaire",
the support people at Microsoft can ignore you.

Whereas, instead of that extreme example, you're just using the thing at
home, your browser still runs, you're totally unaware of any such statements.

The only thing that won't run for sure right now, is if you boot
W11 24H2 on an E8400 Core2Duo, it's going to *crash* because it
does not have a SSE4.2 POPCNT instruction. There is nothing on
Rufus to help bypass the requirement. The MSFT installer checks whether
POPCNT support is present. That's an example of an "absolute prohibition".
I can tell people with confidence, that trying to install W11 on their
Optiplex 780, that's going to be blocked no matter what. Just as easily
as an attempt to install on a P4 or on an AthlonXP 3200 is going to be blocked
for multiple reasons.

But as for "relative statements", such as "I don't like the smell of your aftershave",
my answer to such a proclamation is "fuck you and the barge you sailed in on".
Statements like the above, mean nothing to me.

   [Picture]

    https://i.postimg.cc/1tf7bPNt/patching-all-working.gif

   Paul

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 Feb 25 * Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms15Paul
17 Feb 25 +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Feb 25 `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms13Paul
20 Feb 25  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms12Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25   +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms10Paul
20 Feb 25   i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms8Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25   ii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms7Paul
20 Feb 25   ii +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1rbowman
20 Feb 25   ii `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25   ii  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms4Paul
21 Feb 25   ii   `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Kerr-Mudd, John
22 Feb 25   ii    `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Paul
26 Feb 25   ii     `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Kerr-Mudd, John
21 Feb 25   i`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Daniel70
20 Feb 25   `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Brian Gregory

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal