Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms
De : daniel47 (at) *nospam* eternal-september.org (Daniel70)
Groupes : alt.comp.os.windows-11 comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 18. Feb 2025, 11:40:32
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vp1o30$1lhok$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5
User-Agent : Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:128.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/128.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.20
On 17/02/2025 8:38 am, rbowman wrote:
On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 16:23:49 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:
 
Have you ever considered that an operating system could offer layers of
functionality? For example, a 286 could run Windows 3.0, but if you
wanted the enhanced features, you needed a 386. Why can't it be that way
with Windows again?
 So a software company would have to maintain, build, and test several
branches, some of which would have minimal sales? No thanks.
 
And then you get to 'Pentium' v '586'!! Similar but not the same!!
--
Daniel70

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 Feb 25 * Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms43Johnny LaRue
16 Feb 25 +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Adison Vohn Caterson
16 Feb 25 +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms17rbowman
17 Feb 25 i+- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1rbowman
17 Feb 25 i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms14Anton Shepelev
17 Feb 25 ii+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms8rbowman
20 Feb 25 iii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms7Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25 iii +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Feb 25 iii `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5rbowman
20 Feb 25 iii  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms4Frank Slootweg
21 Feb 25 iii   `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Daniel70
21 Feb 25 iii    +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Frank Slootweg
24 Feb 25 iii    `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Daniel70
17 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Feb 25 ii +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25 ii i`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Feb 25 ii i `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25 ii `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Anton Shepelev
18 Feb 25 i`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Daniel70
17 Feb 25 +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms14Chris
17 Feb 25 i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms8Chris
21 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms7Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25 ii `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms6Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25 ii  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5Paul
21 Feb 25 ii   +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Frank Slootweg
21 Feb 25 ii   i`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Paul
21 Feb 25 ii   `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Feb 25 ii    `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Paul
20 Feb 25 i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms4Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25 ii+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Mark Lloyd
21 Feb 25 iii`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1DFS
10 Mar 25 ii`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1candycanearter07
21 Feb 25 i`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Paul
17 Feb 25 +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms9Anton Shepelev
17 Feb 25 i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Kerr-Mudd, John
20 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25 ii `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Chris Ahlstrom
20 Feb 25 i`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25 i `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms4rbowman
21 Feb 25 i  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Kerr-Mudd, John
21 Feb 25 i   `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Lawrence D'Oliveiro
22 Feb 25 i    `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Paul
20 Feb 25 `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Lawrence D'Oliveiro

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal