Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms
De : nospam (at) *nospam* needed.invalid (Paul)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy alt.comp.os.windows-11
Date : 22. Feb 2025, 01:24:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vpb5gc$3kquu$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
User-Agent : Ratcatcher/2.0.0.25 (Windows/20130802)
On Fri, 2/21/2025 1:10 PM, Kerr-Mudd, John wrote:
On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 10:53:10 -0500
Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> wrote:
 
On Thu, 2/20/2025 4:22 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 12:27:56 -0500, Paul wrote:
>
The original offering was "bash shell".
>
“Bash” stands for “Bourne-Again SHell”. So what you have there is the
“bourne-again shell shell”.
>
>
I didn't pick the name for this thing.
>
I'm forced to use terminology that other
people in the group might recognize.
>
That's the shorthand for the "we don't know why they are doing Linux" project.
The original justification for doing it, was pretty lame.
>
There is probably only one other person than myself using it.
The audience here isn't really interested.
>
But if you want to have XEyes on your Windows desktop, you can.
>
     [Picture]
>
     https://i.postimg.cc/s2sSnJS9/xeyes-are-watching.gif
>
As Anton has said, that's not a picture, it's a web page with stuff that
might show you a picture.
 

Do you know why that caption is there ?

It's for a blind person!!!!!!!

Blind people use web browsers too. They use a screen reader.
If there is text on the web page, they can partake of whatever
is being discussed.

When I would post a picture, I was kindly asked if I might caption
the item, so it could be avoided entirely if the content was
just an image and no other information a blind person could
use was present.

THAT is why the caption is there.

   Paul

Date Sujet#  Auteur
16 Feb 25 * Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms15Paul
17 Feb 25 +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Lawrence D'Oliveiro
17 Feb 25 `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms13Paul
20 Feb 25  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms12Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25   +* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms10Paul
20 Feb 25   i+* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms8Anton Shepelev
20 Feb 25   ii`* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms7Paul
20 Feb 25   ii +- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1rbowman
20 Feb 25   ii `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms5Lawrence D'Oliveiro
21 Feb 25   ii  `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms4Paul
21 Feb 25   ii   `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms3Kerr-Mudd, John
22 Feb 25   ii    `* Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms2Paul
26 Feb 25   ii     `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Kerr-Mudd, John
21 Feb 25   i`- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Daniel70
20 Feb 25   `- Re: Microsoft admits that Windows is short-term support in realistic terms1Brian Gregory

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal