Re: Huge Image! Larry and GuhNoo mediocrity on display

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Huge Image! Larry and GuhNoo mediocrity on display
De : recscuba_google (at) *nospam* huntzinger.com (-hh)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 22. Feb 2025, 04:09:41
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vpbf5l$3m4av$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/21/25 19:22, DFS wrote:
On 2/21/2025 5:52 PM, Lameass Larry wrote:
 
I have, using the phenomenal GNU/Linux image tools, converted
a detail from color to grayscale using the bt709 algorithm.
>
Here is the result:
>
https://i.postimg.cc/YM2dQpDW/gray.png
>
Try that with that junk known as Microslop Winblows.
 Sure thing.
 https://imgur.com/a/b6SgFIu
Was thinking the same thing...
<https://photo-hh.com/usenet/no_one_answer.jpg>

top pic   : via python PIL library (3 lines of code)
middle pic: via the superior Windows-only irfanview
bottom pic: original 200% color enlargement
 Big deal.
 > > Using a simpleton bash script, you converted a color image to grayscale
- alert the media!  Why none of your "extraordinary" C programming?
 Year after year you do something very trivial and ignorantly / dishonestly claim it can't be done on Windows.
 wtf lameass?  Get a new schtick.
 Linux, loneliness and testosterone really is a bad mix.
Plus when it comes to artistic understanding of images, as John Shaw illustrated in his books, there is no one "correct" interpretation.
As such, even derivatives are free to take on their own tangents, which is what I chose to illustrate.
Plus if one wants to emphasize the gnarly crinkled texture, simply crank up the contrast, sharpen, or use an unsharp mask (BTDT).
Plus all have been very available as GUI tools with preview functions such that one can tweak to one's heart content prior to committing the CPU (& human) time to rendering the full image, which results in a more productive workflow than Feeb's scripting from a more immediate artist feedback loop.
-hh

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Feb 25 * Huge Image! GNU/Linux Passes. Microslop???20Farley Flud
21 Feb 25 +* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.15DFS
21 Feb 25 i+* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.10Tyrone
21 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.9Farley Flud
22 Feb 25 ii +- Useless newsgroup (was(?): Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.)1vallor
22 Feb 25 ii `* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.7Tyrone
23 Feb 25 ii  +- Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.1DFS
23 Feb 25 ii  `* Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN. (was: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.)5Tyrone
23 Feb 25 ii   +- Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN.1Physfitfreak
24 Feb 25 ii   `* Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN. (was: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.)3pothead
24 Feb 25 ii    +- Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN. (was: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.)1pothead
24 Feb 25 ii    `- Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN.1pothead
22 Feb 25 i`* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.4-hh
22 Feb 25 i +- Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.1Farley Flud
23 Feb 25 i `* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.2Farley Flud
23 Feb 25 i  `- Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.1-hh
21 Feb 25 +* Re: Huge Image! GNU/Linux Passes. Microslop???3Farley Flud
22 Feb 25 i`* Re: Huge Image! Larry and GuhNoo mediocrity on display2DFS
22 Feb 25 i `- Re: Huge Image! Larry and GuhNoo mediocrity on display1-hh
25 Feb 25 `- Re: Huge Image! GNU/Linux Passes. Microslop???1c186282

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal