Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.

Liste des GroupesRevenir à col advocacy 
Sujet : Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.
De : recscuba_google (at) *nospam* huntzinger.com (-hh)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacy
Date : 23. Feb 2025, 13:05:42
Autres entêtes
Organisation : A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID : <vpf2um$g0nj$1@dont-email.me>
References : 1 2 3 4
User-Agent : Mozilla Thunderbird
On 2/23/25 06:12, Farley Flud wrote:
On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 07:09:05 -0500, -hh wrote:
 
>
The "Huge!" part got me looking at a Kodachrome slide scan I'd done:
>
size: 1,208,386,573 bytes (1.21 GB on disk)
width:  11551
height: 17433
unique colors:  {no idea}
>
 Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  You actually invoked a bloated FOSS ripoff
just to produce that paltry bit of information?
Nope.  I just copied a few attributes from the OS's file explorer app.

There are simple tools that can produce much better
info.
Of course there are.

Below is the output ...
Okay, now explain how each of those outputs are germane & necessary to what you posted about a conversion from color to grayscale, instead of just being a spam of 99% garbage you don't understand.

That's how the pros do it.
You're clearly no pro, for you failed to filter out the garbage.
-hh
--
'The difference between an amateur and a professional is the size of their waste baskets.'

Date Sujet#  Auteur
21 Feb 25 * Huge Image! GNU/Linux Passes. Microslop???20Farley Flud
21 Feb 25 +* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.15DFS
21 Feb 25 i+* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.10Tyrone
21 Feb 25 ii`* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.9Farley Flud
22 Feb 25 ii +- Useless newsgroup (was(?): Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.)1vallor
22 Feb 25 ii `* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.7Tyrone
23 Feb 25 ii  +- Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.1DFS
23 Feb 25 ii  `* Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN. (was: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.)5Tyrone
23 Feb 25 ii   +- Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN.1Physfitfreak
24 Feb 25 ii   `* Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN. (was: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.)3pothead
24 Feb 25 ii    +- Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN. (was: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.)1pothead
24 Feb 25 ii    `- Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN.1pothead
22 Feb 25 i`* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.4-hh
22 Feb 25 i +- Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.1Farley Flud
23 Feb 25 i `* Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.2Farley Flud
23 Feb 25 i  `- Re: Huge Image! GuhNoo FAILS. Windows for the WIN.1-hh
21 Feb 25 +* Re: Huge Image! GNU/Linux Passes. Microslop???3Farley Flud
22 Feb 25 i`* Re: Huge Image! Larry and GuhNoo mediocrity on display2DFS
22 Feb 25 i `- Re: Huge Image! Larry and GuhNoo mediocrity on display1-hh
25 Feb 25 `- Re: Huge Image! GNU/Linux Passes. Microslop???1c186282

Haut de la page

Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.

NewsPortal