Sujet : Re: Rust in Linux
De : bowman (at) *nospam* montana.com (rbowman)
Groupes : comp.os.linux.advocacyDate : 23. Feb 2025, 21:26:10
Autres entêtes
Message-ID : <m21ej2FbohU1@mid.individual.net>
References : 1 2
User-Agent : Pan/0.160 (Toresk; )
On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 09:24:23 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2025-02-22 4:25 p.m., chrisv wrote:
Some of the developers aren't enthused about Rust. But I think that
Linus is, as usual, correct. Rust is a better, inherently more secure,
language.
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/02/linux-leaders-pave-a-path-for-
rust-in-kernel-while-supporting-c-veterans/
Apparently, there is a tremendous performance hit from using Rust over
C. I don't know if newer machines will even notice, but it would be
problematic on older hardware.
Compilation is slower but I don't know about performance. The rust fans
are very vocal and comparisons devolve into religious wars. Some are done
by C programmers that aren't very good at writing rust. Others are done by
rust programmers and are heavily salted with 'unsafe'.