Re: Average Image! Feeb FAILS. Everyone for the WIN.

On 2/23/25 8:35 AM, Tyrone wrote:

On Feb 22, 2025 at 4:26:07 PM EST, "Farley Flud" <ff@linux.rocks> wrote:
 

Nope.  30K x 70K is indeed a huge image.  Outside of scientific circles
such sizes are extremely uncommon.

 It might have been "huge" 20 years ago.  Today it is nothing.  One could edit
this picture on a phone today.
 Which is the whole point.  You claiming this pic is some sort of "test" for
ANY modern computer is absurd. That your pile of shit on a shelf handles it is
proof enough.
 I have easily edited this even on my 11 year old Mac mini. It has a crappy
Intel i5 quad core CPU and 8GB of RAM.  No problems at all. Naturally, my 8
year old Windows 10 laptop also works fine.  It is an i7 hyperthreaded 4 core
with 16GB RAM.
 So, of COURSE this modern Mac can handle it.  If this was 25 years ago and I
had a Pentium 4 with 128 MB RAM and 256K of video RAM, this would be a "huge
file".
 Again, you are truly clueless. But at least you are consistent.  You know
nothing about every topic you pontificate about.
 I see you totally ignored being busted about still being in COLA. You didn't
even bother to add your "new group" this time.  Typical kiddie behaviour.

But hh said all that. So what's your point repeating them here.
You're a sorry ass, aren't you. A "true Sorry Ass!", put in the style of that "true American" idiot.