Liste des Groupes | Revenir à col advocacy |
On 3/2/25 16:14, Joel wrote:Not if one side is bat shit crazy and extraordinarily pissed off? Give nukes to the hard core religious nut bars, and shit happens?-hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:No, not saying that I "want" that. I'm merely noting that when you're doomed to die anyway, nuking the other SOB takes them down with you.
>>>>take my word for it, I'm in on this, Trump is giving us>
a chance to solve this.
But why should I take your word for any of this?
>
Increasing the bullying of a victim doesn't ever stop the bullying.
We've lost the war with Russia, is the bottom line. Ukraine bravely
fought it for us but it hasn't worked. We have to satisfy Putin, fair
as it may not seem.
No, we've not lost the war with Russia. We've barely tried, and we've
been grossly delinquent in living up to the security promises we made to
Ukraine. If you really want to "end it", then we're obligated to give
back to Ukraine their bombers and nukes. Pragmatically, the peace
bringing force-equalizer would be for Russia to fear Moscow being nuked.
>
You're wanting World War III to happen, then? Because that's what
you're implying with that logic.
If that starts a larger exchange (or not) is no longer relevant to you because you're already dead: its the principle of MAD as a deterrent, and my observation is that MAD only works when both sides have nukes.
So if you really want peace, solution is give Ukraine back their nukes.Putin could say who fucking cares. If Ukraine nukes us, we nuke the world, full release.
Les messages affichés proviennent d'usenet.